Log in to view video contentJohn Oliver 教你破解
川普關稅的十算方式
譯：姆斯捲
@BlueATLGeorgia
Unfortunately, that chart is ridiculous for a number of reasons.
For one thing, it features an estimate of tariffs charged to the USA by other countries that no one could figure out until a financial journalist realized it was just how much we export to that country minus how much we import from them divided by how much we import, which is just stunningly dumb because those things have nothing to do with tariffs.
It'd be like trying to figure out the square footage of your home by dividing your phone number by your dog's age or taking your temperature by measuring your head's distance to the sun.
It's not gonna get you the answer that you're looking for.
Now, the White House disputed that claim, releasing this more complicated looking equation they said they'd used, but people quickly pointed out that one symbol meant exports, one meant imports, and the other two numbers were variables set at four and one quarter, so they canceled each other out, meaning it's the same stupid equation everyone said it wasn't in the first place.
Transcript
川普關稅的十算方式
譯：姆斯捲
@BlueATLGeorgia
Unfortunately, that chart is ridiculous for a number of reasons.
For one thing, it features an estimate of tariffs charged to the USA by other countries that no one could figure out until a financial journalist realized it was just how much we export to that country minus how much we import from them divided by how much we import, which is just stunningly dumb because those things have nothing to do with tariffs.
It'd be like trying to figure out the square footage of your home by dividing your phone number by your dog's age or taking your temperature by measuring your head's distance to the sun.
It's not gonna get you the answer that you're looking for.
Now, the White House disputed that claim, releasing this more complicated looking equation they said they'd used, but people quickly pointed out that one symbol meant exports, one meant imports, and the other two numbers were variables set at four and one quarter, so they canceled each other out, meaning it's the same stupid equation everyone said it wasn't in the first place.
Past 31 days
Total Visit: 0
No response has been written yet. It is recommended to maintain a healthy skepticism towards it.
The following is the AI's preliminary analysis of this message, which we hope will provide you with some ideas before it is fact-checked by a human.
這則訊息中有幾個地方需要特別留意：
1. 訊息中提到了一個關於川普關稅的十算方式的圖表，但並未提供該圖表的內容或來源。閱聽人應該注意這種缺乏具體資料支持的訊息，可能會造成誤解或誤導。
2. 訊息中批評了一個被認為荒謬的算式，但並未提供該算式的具體內容或來源。閱聽人應該注意這種對於資訊的批評，是否有足夠的證據或依據支持。
3. 訊息中提到了白宮對於爭議的回應，但同樣未提供具體細節或來源。閱聽人應該注意這種對於爭議性議題的回應，是否具有可信度或透明度。
總之，閱聽人應該對於缺乏具體資料支持的訊息保持懷疑態度，並在接收到爭議性資訊時，積極尋找更多來源以獲取全面的資訊。
查謠言詐騙