快訊 今早 9:00 獨家播出
中共病毒溯源
首部探究中共病毒疫情真相的紀錄片(中文字幕)
https://youtu.be/zyTUkQvJxjQ

【獨家 |中共病毒溯源 】首部探究中共病毒疫情真相的紀錄片:《解密中共病毒的起源》(Tracking Down the Origin of the Wuhan Coronavirus)中文字幕版

#中共病毒 #武漢肺炎 #疫情 01:55 第一章 武漢海鮮市場的故事 09:34 第二章 神秘的基因序列 17:47 第三章 石正麗博士的科學發現 28:50 第四章 武漢P4實驗室的秘密 43:41 第五章 面對全球大瘟疫 紀錄片官網: https://www.theepochtimes.com/coronavirusfilm 目前,中共病毒疫情已蔓延至全球185個國家和地區,

https://youtu.be/zyTUkQvJxjQ
Past 31 days
Total Visit: 0
There is 1 fact-checking reply to the message
Pei-Chi Lo mark this message contains misinformation
originally written by Pei-Chi Lo
■影片中許多論文解讀有誤,如:

①4分9秒提的柳葉刀論文,僅提及研究中第一個出現症狀的病人無武漢海鮮市場接觸史,但這不表示病毒就是人造的。

②10分8秒提的Nature論文,並未認為病毒是人造的、亦未提及武漢病毒實驗室,反而是提及「從動物而來的病毒在人類身上造成嚴重疾病」。

③21分28秒提的兩篇石正麗團隊論文,的確提及對於某些蝙蝠冠狀病毒或許可不透過中間宿主,直接感染人類;也的確人為合成具人類感染力的類SARS病毒,但其研究指出這是提醒蝙蝠冠狀病毒可能會再次出現的風險。無法推論本次疫情的病毒即為此團隊製造。

④25分32秒提的印度學者文章,僅是未經同儕審查的預印本,且因其技術與結果詮釋的爭議,作者已自行撤回論文。

■針對「病毒人造說」,包括Lancet、Nature Medicine等期刊的通訊評論皆依據基因分析,譴責並否認了病毒為人造。

■至於「中國政府抑制疫情訊息」應確實存在,中國科學.生命科學、The Diplomat等皆有相關評析。

References

【遭錯誤詮釋的論文原文】

4分9秒提的柳葉刀論文:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext

10分8秒提的Nature論文:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3

21分28秒提的兩篇石正麗團隊論文:
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12711
https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985

25分32秒提的印度學者文章:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v2

【否認病毒人造的資料】

2020年2月19日Lancet通訊評論:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30418-9/fulltext

2020年3月17日Nature Medicine通訊評論:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

【中國政府壓制訊息的評析】

2020年3月26日The Diplomat報導-Can China’s COVID-19 Statistics Be Trusted?
https://thediplomat.com/2020/03/can-chinas-covid-19-statistics-be-trusted/

2020年2月「中國科學.生命科學」刊出的文章-針對中國疫情應對的檢討:
http://engine.scichina.com/publisher/scp/journal/SSV/doi/10.1360/SSV-2020-0044?slug=fulltext

A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China

AbstractEmerging infectious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Zika virus disease, present a major threat to public health1,2,3. Despite intense research efforts, how, when

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3

Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor

AbstractThe 2002–3 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) was one of the most significant public health events in recent history1. An ongoing outbreak of Middle Ea

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12711

A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence

AbstractThe emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV underscores the threat of cross-species transmission events leading to

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985

Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag

Withdrawn , Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Akhilesh Mishra, Parul Gupta, Praveen Kumar Tripathi, Manoj Balakrishna Menon, James Gomes, Perumal Vivekanandan, Bishwajit Kundu

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v2

The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2

To the Editor — Since the first reports of novel pneumonia (COVID-19) in Wuhan, Hubei province, China1,2, there has been considerable discussion on the origin of the causative virus, SARS-CoV-23 (also

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9
There are 2 replies deleted by its author.

The content above by Cofacts message reporting chatbot and crowd-sourced fact-checking community is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0), the community name and the provenance link for each item shall be fully cited for further reproduction or redistribution.

Add Cofacts as friend in LINE
Add Cofacts as friend in LINE
LINE 機器人
查謠言詐騙