This reply
Lopi mark this message contains personal perspective
originally written by Lopi
1️⃣憲政改革最後終將送交最高法院,查證網站在最高法院裁決之前不宜過度解讀。
2️⃣有關憲政改革,最高法院已經有許多判例,根據這些判例,民進黨申請復議或釋憲,理由不見得站得住腳,詳細整理可以參考廖元豪教授的《從憲政先例論國會改革》參考[1],或國民黨臉書答辯 參考【2】。

Opinion Sources

【1】 廖元豪:從憲政先例論國會改革
https://udn.com/news/story/7340/8024558
【2】國民黨臉書答辯https://www.facebook.com/share/p/HKCtpikuLyrpVhCY

廖元豪/從釋憲先例論國會改革爭議 | 聯合新聞網

立法院通過「國會改革」,讓遲來的國會調查權終於可以運作,也可避免政府官員推拖、拒答,甚至撒謊。但習慣為所欲為的執政黨,卻...

https://udn.com/news/story/7340/8024558

You’re Temporarily Blocked

It looks like you were misusing this feature by going too fast. You’ve been temporarily blocked from using it.If you think this doesn't go against our Community Standards let us know.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/HKCtpikuLyrpVhCY

The content above by Cofacts message reporting chatbot and crowd-sourced fact-checking community is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0), the community name and the provenance link for each item shall be fully cited for further reproduction or redistribution.