廖元豪／從釋憲先例論國會改革爭議 | 聯合新聞網
立法院通過「國會改革」，讓遲來的國會調查權終於可以運作，也可避免政府官員推拖、拒答，甚至撒謊。但習慣為所欲為的執政黨，卻...
Lopi mark this message contains personal perspective
｜originally written by Lopi
1️⃣憲政改革辯論，最後終將送交最高法院裁決，在法院裁決之前，片面宣傳一面之辭，都不宜過度解讀，雙方的辯論應該回歸法庭內言詞辯論，正反意見並陳，查證的責任應該交付法院，基於雙方平等的的辯論，做出判決。
2️⃣有關先前憲政改革，最高法院已經有許多判例，詳細整理可以參考廖元豪教授的《從憲政先例論國會改革》參考［1］
2️⃣有關先前憲政改革，最高法院已經有許多判例，詳細整理可以參考廖元豪教授的《從憲政先例論國會改革》參考［1］
Opinion Sources
【1】 廖元豪：從憲政先例論國會改革
- - https://udn.com/news/story/7340/8024558
【2】國民黨臉書答辯
- - https://www.facebook.com/share/p/HKCtpikuLyrpVhCY
https://udn.com/news/story/7340/8024558
You’re Temporarily Blocked
It looks like you were misusing this feature by going too fast. You’ve been temporarily blocked from using it.If you think this doesn't go against our Community Standards let us know.
The content above by Cofacts message reporting chatbot and crowd-sourced fact-checking community is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0), the community name and the provenance link for each item shall be fully cited for further reproduction or redistribution.