This reply
Ann mark this message contains misinformation
originally written by Ann
1. 文中提及的麻省理工學院(MIT)研究,其並非原創性研究,僅是對「疫苗不良事件報告系統(VAERS)」的數據分析。免疫專家指出,沒有實質證據支持此篇研究的結論。

(1)任何人都可以向VAERS提交通報,不會經過準確性審查,且「不良事件」不一定是藥物引起。若確定存在因果關係,則會稱為「不良反應( Adverse Reaction)」。

(2)美國CDC已聲明:「單憑報告的數據,不能解釋為疫苗與不良事件存在因果關係的證據」、「不能僅憑VAERS的報告,來認定疫苗是否導致或促成不良事件或疾病」。

(3)波士頓兒童醫院的免疫學家Ivan Zanoni、加州大學聖地亞哥分校的分子生物學家 Elina Zúñiga,對此研究均表示:沒有數據或科學證據支持這種說法。

2. 文中提及的荷蘭研究,為2021年5月6日發表於預印本平台medRxiv,但至今尚未通過審查、根本未正式發表。

References

The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.03.21256520v1

Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X

新冠mRNA疫苗造成免疫系統失靈?專家揭MIT研究的真相
https://health.udn.com/health/story/120951/6588986

COVID-19 Vaccination Increases Immunity, Contrary to Immune Suppression Claims
https://www.factcheck.org/2022/07/scicheck-covid-19-vaccination-increases-immunity-contrary-to-immune-suppression-claims/

The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses

The mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech was the first registered COVID-19 vaccine and has been shown to be up to 95% effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections. Little is known about t

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.03.21256520v1

The content above by Cofacts message reporting chatbot and crowd-sourced fact-checking community is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0), the community name and the provenance link for each item shall be fully cited for further reproduction or redistribution.